Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Realty Income Corporation
How Realty Income Corporation stacks up
O · against 13 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
77/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #6 of 14 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including O · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 37.5% vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 73% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.9% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 18.0% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = O, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | O | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 14 reported | 10.9% | 10.2% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 13 reported | 37.5% | 22.6% | 58% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 14 reported | 18.0% | 9.0% | 92% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around O| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 2 | 84.3B USD | 85 | 56 | |
| 3 | 87.3B USD | 84 | 55 | |
| 4 | 56.1B AUD (≈$37.0B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 5 | 44.6B USD | 78 | 39 | |
| 6 | 54.4B USD | 77 | 57 | |
| 7 | 39.2B USD | 74 | 56 | |
| 8 | 100.1B USD | 73 | 44 | |
| 9 | 34.5B USD | 67 | 51 | |
| 10 | 68.1B USD | 55 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score