Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
How Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio stacks up
NXP · against 118 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 119 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including NXP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 199.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 626.0% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NXP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NXP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 199.0% | 4.1% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 106 reported | Not reported | -2.3% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 99 reported | 626.0% | 8.8% | 100% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NXP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 4 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 6 | 6.7B SEK (≈$667M) | 96 | 74 | |
| 6 | 1.3B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 8 | 1.4B USD | 95 | ||
| 8 | 572M GBP (≈$743M) | 95 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score