Ranked #39 of 83 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
16 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including NWG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
A mix: stronger return on equity, but weaker return on assets than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 67% of peers. Return on assets: 0.8% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on equity: 14.8% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NWG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
NWG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 66 reported
Not reported
12.6%
—
—
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 5 reported
Not reported
28.8%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 83 reported
0.8%
0.9%
40%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 83 reported
14.8%
13.9%
61%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 87 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
