Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NWBI · against 253 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #163 of 254 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score26 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including NWBI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | NWBI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 231 reported | 8.5% | 10.2% | 39% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 39 reported | Not reported | 26.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 255 reported | 0.9% | 1.2% | 35% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 253 reported | 8.6% | 9.9% | 40% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 268 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 98 | 38 | |
| 1 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 160 | 18.3B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 31 | 59 | |
| 160 | 1.8B USD | 31 | 56 | |
| 163 | 29.5B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 30 | 55 | |
| 163 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 30 | 32 | |
| 163 | 2.3B USD | 30 | 35 | |
| 166 | 3.8B USD | 29 | 22 | |
| 166 | 283.4B INR (≈$3.4B) | 29 | 48 | |
| 166 | 2.2B CHF (≈$2.5B) | 29 | 49 | |
| 169 | 22.3B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 28 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score