Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.
How Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
NUS · against 208 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Profitability
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #182 of 209 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score32 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including NUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -19.3% vs peer median 4.0%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 89% of peers. Operating margin: -0.8% vs peer median 7.6%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 84% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.5% vs peer median 7.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 184 reported | -1.5% | 4.1% | 23% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 209 reported | -0.8% | 4.8% | 17% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 202 reported | -19.3% | 2.6% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 200 reported | -32.5% | 4.9% | 7% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 209 reported | 69.2% | 28.5% | 96% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.2B JPY (≈$376M) | 99 | 87 | |
| 1 | 14.8B THB (≈$413M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.5B TWD (≈$201M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 4 | 8.2B THB (≈$229M) | 97 | 67 | |
| 5 | 187M USD | 94 | 78 | |
| 178 | 1.6B NOK (≈$154M) | 9 | 33 | |
| 178 | 38.0B INR (≈$456M) | 9 | 11 | |
| 182 | 2.3B CNY (≈$329M) | 8 | 24 | |
| 182 | 3.1B NOK (≈$298M) | 8 | 12 | |
| 182 | 229M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 182 | 308M NZD (≈$185M) | 8 | 18 | |
| 186 | 309M USD | 7 | 16 | |
| 186 | 340M SGD (≈$258M) | 7 | 44 | |
| 186 | 172M USD | 7 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score