Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Natera, Inc.
How Natera, Inc. stacks up
NTRA · against 57 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #55 of 58 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including NTRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -0.4% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 0.2% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTRA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | -0.4% | 2.9% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | -0.4% | 6.1% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 0.1% | 3.7% | 5% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 3.3% | 21.1% | 9% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTRA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 2 | 78.1B USD | 89 | 60 | |
| 3 | 108.6B USD | 88 | 66 | |
| 4 | 97.5B USD | 87 | 67 | |
| 5 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 86 | 70 | |
| 53 | 2.67T INR (≈$32.1B) | 39 | 68 | |
| 54 | 45.2B USD | 38 | 46 | |
| 55 | 33.3B USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 55 | 91.2B USD | 8 | 18 | |
| 55 | 56.0B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 55 | 41.6B USD | 8 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score