Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NTRA · against 58 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 59 · scores higher than 57% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including NTRA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NTRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 56 reported | 0.13× | 0.48× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 56 reported | 1.50 | 0.70 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 56 reported | 3.00× | 1.77× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 2 | 56.7B USD | 85 | 79 | |
| 3 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2.67T INR (≈$32.1B) | 82 | 68 | |
| 5 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 22 | 35.0B USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 23 | 91.2B USD | 45 | 18 | |
| 24 | 38.9B USD | 39 | 56 | |
| 25 | 84.5B EUR (≈$92.9B) | 37 | 51 | |
| 26 | 56.0B USD | 37 | 39 | |
| 27 | 64.8B EUR (≈$71.3B) | 35 | 51 | |
| 28 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 35 | 76 | |
| 29 | 63.0B USD | 34 | 65 | |
| 30 | 36.8B USD | 34 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score