Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nutrien Ltd.
How Nutrien Ltd. stacks up
NTR · against 57 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
84/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #16 of 58 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including NTR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -10.8% vs peer median -0.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 242.6% vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 58 reported | 3.5% | 9.2% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 46 reported | 242.6% | 46.0% | 93% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 58 reported | -10.8% | 2.2% | 11% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 53.3B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 486.3B MXN (≈$26.3B) | 98 | 91 | |
| 4 | 30.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 13 | 30.3B USD | 87 | 59 | |
| 14 | 30.9B GBP (≈$40.2B) | 85 | 67 | |
| 14 | 2.20T INR (≈$26.4B) | 85 | 55 | |
| 16 | 38.6B USD | 84 | 60 | |
| 16 | 33.1B USD | 84 | 63 | |
| 16 | 26.2B EUR (≈$28.8B) | 84 | 62 | |
| 19 | 215.8B SAR (≈$58.3B) | 83 | 64 | |
| 19 | 23.5B USD | 83 | 43 | |
| 19 | 1.78T INR (≈$21.3B) | 83 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score