Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NTLA · against 440 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #316 of 441 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score126 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including NTLA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | NTLA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 429 reported | -28.2% | 1.5% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 441 reported | -32.0% | 4.3% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | -21.0% | -0.5% | 3% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 431 reported | 43.8% | 36.9% | 58% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 40.2B MXN (≈$2.2B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 316 | 2.8B USD | 8 | 22 | |
| 316 | 2.3B USD | 8 | 26 | |
| 316 | 1.5B USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 316 | 1.3B USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 316 | 1.7B USD | 8 | 33 | |
| 316 | 1.6B USD | 8 | 38 | |
| 316 | 1.6B USD | 8 | 7 | |
| 316 | 1.6B USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 316 | 1.5B USD | 8 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score