Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NTAP · against 108 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #101 of 109 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including NTAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NTAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 104 reported | 1.69× | 0.32× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 105 reported | 1.45 | 1.19 | 35% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 107 reported | 1.24× | 1.67× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 3 | 40.5B USD | 91 | 75 | |
| 4 | 28.4B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 5 | 176.1B CNY (≈$24.7B) | 87 | 78 | |
| 97 | 66.3B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 98 | 351.9B CNY (≈$49.3B) | 11 | 50 | |
| 99 | 1.28T TWD (≈$39.6B) | 10 | 59 | |
| 100 | 605.4B TWD (≈$18.8B) | 7 | 59 | |
| 101 | 37.5B USD | 6 | 56 | |
| 102 | 28.4B USD | 6 | 50 | |
| 103 | 24.0B USD | 5 | 30 | |
| 104 | 26.7B USD | 5 | 57 | |
| 105 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 5 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score