Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Insight Enterprises, Inc.
How Insight Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
NSIT · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #79 of 497 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including NSIT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 2.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.0% vs peer median 4.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NSIT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NSIT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 4.4% | 2.0% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 10.7% | 4.3% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 8.8% | 3.6% | 86% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 35.6% | 25.0% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NSIT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 842M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 353M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 74 | 17.0B USD | 80 | 57 | |
| 79 | 242M USD | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score