Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Novanta Inc.
How Novanta Inc. stacks up
NOVT · against 315 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #222 of 316 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score53 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including NOVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.0% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 1.1% | 2.5% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 320 reported | 3.5% | 4.3% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | 2.0% | 2.9% | 41% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 29.0% | 24.1% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 1 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 83 | |
| 5 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 214 | 6.8B USD | 36 | 52 | |
| 222 | 5.31T KRW (≈$3.8B) | 35 | 26 | |
| 222 | 51.7B CNY (≈$7.2B) | 35 | 63 | |
| 222 | 3.5B USD | 35 | 68 | |
| 222 | 5.6B USD | 35 | 50 | |
| 226 | 20.9B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 34 | 62 | |
| 226 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 34 | 75 | |
| 226 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 34 | 65 | |
| 226 | 10.5B AUD (≈$7.0B) | 34 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score