Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOMD · against 216 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #184 of 217 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)20 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including NOMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NOMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 209 reported | 0.92× | 0.35× | 22% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 212 reported | 0.67 | 0.35 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 206 reported | 1.10× | 1.81× | 22% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 176.3B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 180 | 1.1B USD | 24 | 31 | |
| 181 | 56.4B THB (≈$1.6B) | 23 | 71 | |
| 182 | 1.2B USD | 22 | 38 | |
| 183 | 1.71T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 22 | 32 | |
| 184 | 1.7B USD | 21 | 42 | |
| 185 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 20 | 60 | |
| 186 | 1.4B USD | 20 | 33 | |
| 187 | 6.3B CNY (≈$878M) | 19 | 8 | |
| 188 | 13.4B NOK (≈$1.3B) | 19 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score