Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Northrop Grumman Corporation
How Northrop Grumman Corporation stacks up
NOC · against 73 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #10 of 74 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including NOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.8% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 5.7% | 3.2% | 89% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 7.8% | 5.4% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 4.7% | 3.5% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 22.9% | 16.8% | 69% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 83 | 54 | |
| 2 | 71.0B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 3 | 54.8B USD | 73 | 49 | |
| 3 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 73 | 45 | |
| 5 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 68 | 62 | |
| 5 | 6.21T JPY (≈$42.2B) | 68 | 53 | |
| 7 | 41.4B EUR (≈$45.5B) | 65 | 66 | |
| 8 | 92.9B USD | 60 | 41 | |
| 9 | 75.3B USD | 57 | 39 | |
| 10 | 78.2B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 11 | 22.15T JPY (≈$150.6B) | 54 | 60 | |
| 11 | 7.82T JPY (≈$53.2B) | 54 | 40 | |
| 13 | 627.9B SEK (≈$62.8B) | 53 | 38 | |
| 14 | 101.3B USD | 52 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score