Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOC · against 73 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #38 of 74 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including NOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 71 reported | 0.95× | 0.73× | 39% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 73 reported | -0.11 | 0.95 | 100% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 72 reported | 1.17× | 1.18× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 2 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 3 | 3.32T INR (≈$39.8B) | 79 | 53 | |
| 4 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 68 | 45 | |
| 5 | 6.46T JPY (≈$43.9B) | 67 | 71 | |
| 34 | 119.2B USD | 25 | 51 | |
| 35 | 45.2B USD | 24 | 47 | |
| 36 | 60.7B GBP (≈$78.9B) | 24 | 48 | |
| 37 | 74.4B USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 38 | 78.2B USD | 23 | 52 | |
| 39 | 345.9B DKK (≈$51.9B) | 22 | 47 | |
| 40 | 91.8B USD | 21 | 54 | |
| 41 | 47.0B USD | 21 | 51 | |
| 42 | 3.51T INR (≈$42.1B) | 20 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score