Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOA · against 61 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #56 of 62 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including NOA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NOA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 59 reported | 2.47× | 0.48× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 58 reported | 1.14 | 0.47 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 62 reported | 1.07× | 1.48× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 4 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 5 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 94 | 34 | |
| 52 | 4.5B HKD (≈$576M) | 10 | 19 | |
| 53 | 306M USD | 9 | 48 | |
| 54 | 527M CAD (≈$385M) | 7 | 11 | |
| 55 | 363M USD | 7 | 37 | |
| 56 | 318M USD | 6 | 44 | |
| 57 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 5 | 28 | |
| 58 | 811M AUD (≈$535M) | 3 | 1 | |
| 59 | 5.0B NOK (≈$477M) | 2 | 34 | |
| 60 | 476M USD | 2 | 2 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score