Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to North American Construction Group Ltd.
How North American Construction Group Ltd. stacks up
NOA · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
30/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #135 of 197 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score15 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including NOA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 63% of peers. Return on invested capital: 6.8% vs peer median 9.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 8.5% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | 6.8% | 9.2% | 38% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 8.5% | 13.4% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | 1.9% | 4.4% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | 6.9% | 11.8% | 35% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 29.2% | 41.2% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.8B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 986M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 133 | 117.5B USD | 31 | 32 | |
| 133 | 12.2B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score