Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nano Dimension Ltd.
How Nano Dimension Ltd. stacks up
NNDM · against 405 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
17/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #297 of 406 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score48 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including NNDM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -57.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -17.9% vs peer median 2.7%
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NNDM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NNDM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 389 reported | -48.5% | 1.7% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 422 reported | 77.8% | 4.2% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -23.3% | 1.8% | 10% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 395 reported | 168.1% | 46.6% | 94% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NNDMScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score