Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nano Dimension Ltd.
How Nano Dimension Ltd. stacks up
NNDM · against 426 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
1/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #404 of 427 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score72 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including NNDM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 1?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -29.4% vs peer median 2.9%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on invested capital: -84.7% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 97% of peers. Operating margin: -117.4% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NNDM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NNDM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 389 reported | -84.7% | 2.8% | 3% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 422 reported | -117.4% | 3.4% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 418 reported | -29.4% | 1.3% | 4% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 407 reported | -24.5% | 3.5% | 12% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 427 reported | 38.8% | 28.5% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NNDM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 404 | 261M USD | 1 | 30 | |
| 404 | 200M USD | 1 | 32 | |
| 404 | 252M AUD (≈$166M) | 1 | 57 | |
| 404 | 265M USD | 1 | 16 | |
| 404 | 287M USD | 1 | 53 | |
| 404 | 336M USD | 1 | 45 | |
| 404 | 159M USD | 1 | 43 | |
| 404 | 2.8B NOK (≈$270M) | 1 | 47 | |
| 404 | 316M USD | 1 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score