Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nano Dimension Ltd.
How Nano Dimension Ltd. stacks up
NNDM · against 406 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 407 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including NNDM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 32.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 73.5% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NNDM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NNDM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 417 reported | 73.5% | 3.7% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 217 reported | Not reported | 2.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 404 reported | 32.6% | 1.1% | 97% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NNDM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 3.4B CNY (≈$482M) | 99 | 91 | |
| 1 | 218M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 4 | 67.2B JPY (≈$457M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 4 | 287M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 6 | 29.8B JPY (≈$203M) | 97 | 66 | |
| 6 | 461M EUR (≈$507M) | 97 | 56 | |
| 6 | 500M USD | 97 | 93 | |
| 9 | 667.7B KRW (≈$481M) | 95 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score