Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Newmark Group, Inc.
How Newmark Group, Inc. stacks up
NMRK · against 161 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 162 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including NMRK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 89?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 5.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 85% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.8% vs peer median 5.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 26.6% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NMRK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NMRK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 171 reported | 6.6% | 5.4% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 161 reported | 9.2% | 5.4% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | 27.4% | 6.7% | 97% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 174 reported | 66.8% | 106.2% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NMRK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.2B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 96 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 4 | 1.7B USD | 92 | 41 | |
| 5 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 89 | 83 | |
| 5 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 5 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 89 | 67 | |
| 8 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 88 | 75 | |
| 8 | 60.7B TRY (≈$1.8B) | 88 | 79 | |
| 10 | 1.5B USD | 87 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score