Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to New Mountain Finance Corporation
How New Mountain Finance Corporation stacks up
NMFC · against 123 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #93 of 124 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score16 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including NMFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 93% of peers. Return on assets: -2.0% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.5% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NMFC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NMFC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 120 reported | 7.5% | 5.3% | 70% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 61 reported | Not reported | 21.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 141 reported | -2.0% | 2.6% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 136 reported | -4.1% | 6.2% | 12% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 157 reported | 100.0% | 96.9% | 52% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NMFCScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score