Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to New Mountain Finance Corporation
How New Mountain Finance Corporation stacks up
NMFC · against 120 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
3/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #117 of 121 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including NMFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 3?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 100% of peers. Revenue growth: -88.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 10.0%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -45.0% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NMFC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NMFC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 136 reported | -88.0% | 4.0% | 1% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 96 reported | -84.5% | -2.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 102 reported | -45.0% | 6.6% | 2% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NMFC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 4 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 114 | 653M AUD (≈$431M) | 5 | ||
| 114 | 1.2B USD | 5 | ||
| 116 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 4 | 63 | |
| 117 | 6.6B BRL (≈$1.2B) | 3 | 50 | |
| 117 | 662M USD | 3 | 37 | |
| 119 | 775M USD | 2 | 28 | |
| 120 | 1.0B USD | 1 | 20 | |
| 121 | 1.2B SGD (≈$935M) | 0 | 3 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score