Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NGS · against 73 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #43 of 74 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including NGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | NGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | 5.1% | 3.1% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | 11.4% | 10.6% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | -7.7% | 6.1% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 71 reported | 72.2% | 83.0% | 43% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 4 | 291M GBP (≈$378M) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 96 | 77 | |
| 39 | 665M USD | 42 | 30 | |
| 39 | 448M USD | 42 | 42 | |
| 41 | 3.1B CNY (≈$437M) | 40 | 66 | |
| 42 | 412M USD | 36 | 42 | |
| 43 | 408M USD | 34 | 55 | |
| 44 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 33 | 45 | |
| 45 | 755M USD | 32 | 41 | |
| 46 | 670.8B KRW (≈$483M) | 29 | 69 | |
| 47 | 527M CAD (≈$385M) | 20 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score