Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
How National Energy Services Reunited Corp. stacks up
NESR · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #114 of 197 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including NESR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 9.3% vs peer median 11.7%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 4.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 10.5% vs peer median 9.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NESR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NESR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | 10.5% | 9.2% | 56% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 9.3% | 13.4% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | 4.5% | 4.4% | 50% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | 9.4% | 11.8% | 41% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 13.3% | 41.2% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NESR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.8B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 960M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 110 | 2.3B USD | 46 | 52 | |
| 110 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score