Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NEM · against 16 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Ranked #3 of 17 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including NEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
| Metric | NEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 17 reported | 7.4% | 4.7% | 81% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 17 reported | 15.5% | 8.9% | 88% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 8.6% | 3.0% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 17 reported | 31.0% | 25.7% | 69% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 85.5B CAD (≈$62.4B) | 90 | 85 | |
| 2 | 725.9B HKD (≈$92.9B) | 87 | 71 | |
| 3 | 113.2B USD | 82 | 86 | |
| 4 | 132.7B USD | 75 | 64 | |
| 5 | 198.6B USD | 74 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1.75T MXN (≈$94.4B) | 68 | 79 | |
| 7 | 84.6B USD | 67 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score