Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NEM · against 16 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 17 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including NEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 17 reported | 0.16× | 0.49× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 17 reported | 0.53 | 0.88 | 94% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 17 reported | 2.55× | 1.84× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T MXN (≈$94.4B) | 87 | 79 | |
| 2 | 113.2B USD | 77 | 86 | |
| 3 | 149.9B USD | 75 | 76 | |
| 4 | 84.6B USD | 71 | 82 | |
| 5 | 85.5B CAD (≈$62.4B) | 65 | 85 | |
| 6 | 215.8B SAR (≈$58.3B) | 55 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score