Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Newmont Corporation
How Newmont Corporation stacks up
NEM · against 16 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 17 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including NEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 42.8% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: 25.2% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 32.0% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NEM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 17 reported | 25.2% | 12.4% | 81% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 16 reported | 42.8% | 39.9% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 17 reported | 32.0% | 4.5% | 100% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NEM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84.6B USD | 95 | 82 | |
| 2 | 88.7B USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 3 | 85.5B CAD (≈$62.4B) | 91 | 85 | |
| 4 | 113.2B USD | 88 | 86 | |
| 5 | 149.9B USD | 86 | 76 | |
| 6 | 215.8B SAR (≈$58.3B) | 83 | 64 | |
| 7 | 62.1B USD | 81 | 58 | |
| 8 | 725.9B HKD (≈$92.9B) | 78 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score