Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Newegg Commerce, Inc.
How Newegg Commerce, Inc. stacks up
NEGG · against 273 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #156 of 274 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score16 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including NEGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NEGG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NEGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 259 reported | 4.9% | 4.1% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 281 reported | 7.7% | 10.5% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 104 reported | Not reported | 6.5% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 260 reported | 88.8% | 91.3% | 48% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NEGG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1.1B HKD (≈$137M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 153 | 255M USD | 47 | 35 | |
| 153 | 1.0B BRL (≈$186M) | 47 | 32 | |
| 155 | 12.4B THB (≈$347M) | 46 | 34 | |
| 156 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 45 | 81 | |
| 156 | 193M USD | 45 | 34 | |
| 158 | 1.5B SEK (≈$147M) | 44 | 60 | |
| 159 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 43 | 37 | |
| 159 | 3.1B SEK (≈$314M) | 43 | 43 | |
| 161 | 2.5B CNY (≈$357M) | 42 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score