Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NEGG · against 283 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #244 of 284 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score41 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including NEGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | NEGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 260 reported | -14.3% | 3.3% | 7% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 282 reported | -0.7% | 3.8% | 23% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 274 reported | -1.0% | 1.9% | 20% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 269 reported | 6.5% | 3.7% | 63% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 285 reported | 12.5% | 26.0% | 19% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 6.9B TWD (≈$214M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 4 | 42.1B JPY (≈$286M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 240 | 1.8B CNY (≈$254M) | 10 | 36 | |
| 240 | 3.6B TWD (≈$112M) | 10 | 25 | |
| 240 | 256M USD | 10 | 29 | |
| 244 | 15.4B JPY (≈$105M) | 9 | 34 | |
| 244 | 193M USD | 9 | 34 | |
| 244 | 5.1B TRY (≈$154M) | 9 | 27 | |
| 244 | 237M USD | 9 | 35 | |
| 248 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 8 | 4 | |
| 248 | 11.3B TWD (≈$351M) | 8 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score