Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NE · against 104 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #53 of 105 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 49
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including NE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 0.43× | 0.56× | 61% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 107 reported | 1.01 | 0.52 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 104 reported | 1.92× | 1.38× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 94 | 77 | |
| 5 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 94 | 51 | |
| 49 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 50 | 31 | |
| 50 | 42.1B CNY (≈$5.9B) | 49 | 30 | |
| 51 | 6.3B USD | 49 | 53 | |
| 52 | 6.4B USD | 49 | 68 | |
| 53 | 7.0B USD | 49 | 36 | |
| 54 | 44.3B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 47 | 35 | |
| 55 | 30.1B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 45 | 23 | |
| 56 | 6.2B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 57 | 6.0B USD | 44 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score