Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to National CineMedia, Inc.
How National CineMedia, Inc. stacks up
NCMI · against 47 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #24 of 48 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including NCMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.3% vs peer median 2.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.6% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NCMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NCMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | -5.3% | 2.9% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 17.6% | 12.6% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 29 reported | 13.6% | 9.8% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 235.6% | 97.4% | 80% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NCMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 134M EUR (≈$147M) | 99 | 45 | |
| 3 | 208.1B KRW (≈$150M) | 97 | 63 | |
| 4 | 120.8B KRW (≈$87M) | 95 | 59 | |
| 4 | 151M USD | 95 | 60 | |
| 20 | 439M BRL (≈$79M) | 77 | 80 | |
| 21 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 75 | 73 | |
| 22 | 136M EUR (≈$149M) | 71 | 55 | |
| 23 | 20.2B JPY (≈$137M) | 69 | 69 | |
| 24 | 142M USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 25 | 239M AUD (≈$158M) | 63 | 52 | |
| 26 | 2.74T IDR (≈$170M) | 60 | 34 | |
| 26 | 248M USD | 60 | 58 | |
| 28 | 1.2B SEK (≈$122M) | 49 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score