Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NACCO Industries, Inc.
How NACCO Industries, Inc. stacks up
NC · against 45 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 46 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including NC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 81% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -45.6% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 71% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 49 reported | 4.7% | -1.8% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 27 reported | -45.6% | -2.6% | 19% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 46 reported | 5.5% | -0.8% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 2 | 412M USD | 93 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 92 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2.4B CNY (≈$337M) | 92 | 45 | |
| 19 | 290M USD | 61 | 34 | |
| 20 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 54 | 45 | |
| 20 | 344M USD | 54 | 28 | |
| 22 | 76.6B JPY (≈$521M) | 48 | 52 | |
| 23 | 261M USD | 43 | 56 | |
| 24 | 448M USD | 41 | 42 | |
| 25 | 392M USD | 39 | 21 | |
| 26 | 363M USD | 37 | 37 | |
| 27 | 328M USD | 36 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score