Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nebius Group N.V.
How Nebius Group N.V. stacks up
NBIS · against 29 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 30 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including NBIS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 8.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 239.8% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 100% of peers. Revenue growth: 479.0% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NBIS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NBIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 30 reported | 479.0% | 7.8% | 100% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 21 reported | Not reported | 4.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 30 reported | 239.8% | 5.6% | 100% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NBIS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 3 | 23.8B USD | 93 | 61 | |
| 4 | 9.39T JPY (≈$63.9B) | 89 | 78 | |
| 4 | 22.0B USD | 89 | 54 | |
| 4 | 24.0B USD | 89 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score