How Navient Corporation stacks up

NAVI · against 101 other Financial Services companies of similar size

Overall

28/ 100

Near the bottom of its peers.

Ranked #91 of 102 · scores higher than 11% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

7 peers with an overall score of 20–29, including NAVI · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#25 of 79Score 78 / 100 · beats 68%Growth#118 of 120Score 2 / 100 · beats 2%Profitability#95 of 114Score 17 / 100 · beats 16%Risk#116 of 129Higher relative risk · safety 13 · beats 10%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around NAVI

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	PT Saratoga Investama Sedaya TbkSRTG.JK · Southeast Asia	21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B)	93		85	96	0 / 2
2	OppFi Inc.OPFI · US-listed	498M USD	90	100	83	91	0 / 2
3	Tetragon Financial Group LimitedTFG.L · United Kingdom	1.3B USD	79		96	56	0 / 2
4	Vinci Compass Investments Ltd.VINP · US-listed	566M USD	75	66	90	67	0 / 2
5	Capital Southwest CorporationCSWC · US-listed	1.5B USD	74	53	82	66	0 / 2
⋯
87	Green Dot CorporationGDOT · US-listed	709M USD	32	26	48	13	1 / 2
88	Intrum AB (publ)INTRUM.ST · Europe	6.4B SEK (≈$637M)	30	51	14	46	2 / 2
89	Hotai Finance Co., Ltd.6592.TW · Taiwan	36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B)	29	49	20	40	2 / 2
89	Taiwan Acceptance Corporation9941.TW · Taiwan	44.7B TWD (≈$1.4B)	29	57	40	12	2 / 2
91	Navient CorporationNAVI · US-listed	775M USD	28	78	2	17	2 / 2
92	Mutares SE & Co. KGaAMUX.DE · Europe	688M EUR (≈$757M)	25	0	77	5	2 / 2
93	Ricoh Leasing Company, Ltd.8566.T · Japan	192.3B JPY (≈$1.3B)	23	31	28	21	2 / 2
94	JACCS Co., Ltd.8584.T · Japan	149.8B JPY (≈$1.0B)	20	30	22	20	2 / 2
94	Tortoise Energy Infrastructure CorporationTYG · US-listed	1.0B USD	20		1	19	1 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…