Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.
How Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. stacks up
NAUT · against 352 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #265 of 353 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score48 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including NAUT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 88% of peers. Return on assets: -34.6% vs peer median 1.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 77% of peers. Return on invested capital: -16.6% vs peer median 4.7%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NAUT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NAUT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 318 reported | -16.6% | -0.5% | 31% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 327 reported | Not reported | 2.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 353 reported | -34.6% | -0.4% | 14% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 332 reported | -36.2% | -1.6% | 23% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 368 reported | 92.1% | 36.9% | 93% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NAUT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 5.5B NOK (≈$523M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 4 | 261M USD | 98 | 97 | |
| 259 | 375M USD | 21 | 46 | |
| 259 | 285M USD | 21 | 38 | |
| 265 | 222M USD | 20 | 31 | |
| 265 | 238M USD | 20 | 41 | |
| 265 | 299M USD | 20 | 38 | |
| 268 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 19 | 65 | |
| 268 | 441M USD | 19 | 34 | |
| 268 | 522M USD | 19 | 12 | |
| 271 | 165M USD | 18 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score