Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nordic American Tankers Limited
How Nordic American Tankers Limited stacks up
NAT · against 108 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
11/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #90 of 109 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including NAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -73.7% vs peer median 1.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: -16.6% vs peer median 0.5%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.9% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 111 reported | -16.6% | 1.3% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | -73.7% | -20.2% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 108 reported | -4.9% | -0.4% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 5 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 87 | 2.5B USD | 17 | 31 | |
| 88 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 15 | 47 | |
| 89 | 1.2B USD | 14 | 68 | |
| 90 | 1.1B USD | 11 | 55 | |
| 90 | 1.6B USD | 11 | 30 | |
| 92 | 2.2B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 10 | 37 | |
| 92 | 1.6B USD | 10 | 61 | |
| 94 | 2.7B USD | 9 | 21 | |
| 95 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 8 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score