Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NAMS · against 381 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #36 of 382 · scores higher than 91% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including NAMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NAMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 361 reported | 0.00× | 0.22× | 100% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 364 reported | 0.09 | 0.59 | 88% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 367 reported | 9.03× | 2.82× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 1.8B USD | 99 | 42 | |
| 32 | 1.8B USD | 93 | 79 | |
| 33 | 1.2B USD | 92 | 67 | |
| 34 | 3.8B USD | 92 | 48 | |
| 35 | 2.8B USD | 92 | 51 | |
| 36 | 2.3B USD | 92 | 26 | |
| 37 | 1.3B USD | 91 | ||
| 38 | 1.8B USD | 91 | ||
| 39 | 3.1B USD | 90 | 39 | |
| 40 | 40.3B SEK (≈$4.0B) | 90 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score