Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
How Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. stacks up
NAK · against 468 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #387 of 469 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score83 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including NAK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -18.9% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -5.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.2% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NAK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NAK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | Not reported | 2.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 476 reported | -5.3% | 6.4% | 7% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | -4.2% | -0.9% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | Not reported | 71.2% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NAK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 629.2B CLP (≈$692M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 387 | 354M CAD (≈$259M) | 8 | ||
| 387 | 683M USD | 8 | ||
| 387 | 658M USD | 8 | ||
| 387 | 429M USD | 8 | 13 | |
| 387 | 393M USD | 8 | ||
| 387 | 435M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 387 | 577M USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 387 | 673M USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 387 | 338M USD | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score