Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Micware Co., Ltd.
How Micware Co., Ltd. stacks up
MWC · against 103 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #14 of 104 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including MWC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 85% of peers. EBITDA yield: 25.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MWC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MWC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 97 reported | 11.0% | 2.9% | 85% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | 17.5% | 10.5% | 76% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | Not reported | 6.9% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 57.7% | 134.7% | 24% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MWC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 104.2B KRW (≈$75M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1.1B HKD (≈$137M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 545M HKD (≈$70M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 9 | 2.23T IDR (≈$138M) | 97 | 55 | |
| 12 | 411M BRL (≈$74M) | 96 | 59 | |
| 13 | 973M HKD (≈$125M) | 95 | 49 | |
| 14 | 237M MYR (≈$52M) | 94 | 88 | |
| 14 | 92M USD | 94 | 78 | |
| 16 | 100.4B KRW (≈$72M) | 93 | 42 | |
| 16 | 25.7B JPY (≈$175M) | 93 | 67 | |
| 18 | 147.2B KRW (≈$106M) | 92 | 50 | |
| 18 | 17.6B JPY (≈$120M) | 92 | 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score