Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MWC · against 118 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #55 of 119 · scores higher than 54% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including MWC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MWC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 109 reported | 1.17× | 0.62× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 115 reported | Not reported | 0.49 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 117 reported | 1.66× | 1.35× | 61% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 4 | 607M MYR (≈$134M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 511M SAR (≈$138M) | 99 | 32 | |
| 51 | 146.0B KRW (≈$105M) | 54 | 48 | |
| 52 | 1.9B TRY (≈$56M) | 52 | 47 | |
| 53 | 10.2B JPY (≈$70M) | 52 | 51 | |
| 54 | 1.1B HKD (≈$139M) | 51 | 47 | |
| 55 | 92M USD | 50 | 78 | |
| 56 | 843.1B IDR (≈$52M) | 49 | 47 | |
| 57 | 1.5B SEK (≈$147M) | 48 | 60 | |
| 58 | 722M HKD (≈$92M) | 48 | 16 | |
| 59 | 2.7B MXN (≈$144M) | 48 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score