Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Microvast Holdings, Inc.
How Microvast Holdings, Inc. stacks up
MVST · against 365 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
79/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #96 of 366 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score32 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including MVST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -13.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 84% of peers. Earnings yield: 22.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MVST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MVST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 351 reported | -1.7% | 3.3% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 374 reported | 13.7% | 8.9% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | -13.1% | 6.8% | 11% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 233.8% | 76.0% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MVST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 93 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 80 | 92 | |
| 96 | 3.6B HKD (≈$462M) | 79 | 35 | |
| 96 | 42.7B JPY (≈$290M) | 79 | 80 | |
| 96 | 1.7B MYR (≈$370M) | 79 | 63 | |
| 96 | 232M USD | 79 | 48 | |
| 96 | 1.9B BRL (≈$340M) | 79 | 57 | |
| 96 | 26.5B INR (≈$317M) | 79 | 77 | |
| 102 | 6.7B TWD (≈$209M) | 78 | 65 | |
| 102 | 335M USD | 78 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score