Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Microvast Holdings, Inc.
How Microvast Holdings, Inc. stacks up
MVST · against 374 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #282 of 375 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score62 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including MVST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 93% of peers. Operating margin: -7.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 89% of peers. Return on invested capital: -4.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 5.4% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MVST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MVST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 350 reported | -4.0% | 3.9% | 15% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 373 reported | -7.3% | 4.0% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 359 reported | 5.4% | 2.0% | 86% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 352 reported | 11.4% | 4.1% | 82% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 376 reported | 34.0% | 26.7% | 61% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MVST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 2 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 6.9B TWD (≈$214M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 282 | 2.5B CNY (≈$349M) | 16 | 24 | |
| 282 | 1.9B HKD (≈$240M) | 16 | 36 | |
| 282 | 4.6B TWD (≈$143M) | 16 | 18 | |
| 282 | 383M USD | 16 | 40 | |
| 282 | 232M USD | 16 | 48 | |
| 292 | 662M SAR (≈$179M) | 15 | 35 | |
| 292 | 59.7B JPY (≈$406M) | 15 | 21 | |
| 292 | 2.1B CNY (≈$294M) | 15 | 46 | |
| 292 | 386M CAD (≈$282M) | 15 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score