Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MVIS · against 31 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 32 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including MVIS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MVIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 28 reported | 2.20× | 0.44× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 1.17 | 0.60 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 31 reported | 0.68× | 1.25× | 20% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 45M EUR (≈$50M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 3 | 46M EUR (≈$50M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 66M USD | 93 | 51 | |
| 5 | 113M MYR (≈$25M) | 88 | 80 | |
| 22 | 912M TWD (≈$28M) | 7 | 11 | |
| 23 | 39.0B KRW (≈$28M) | 6 | 14 | |
| 24 | 181M HKD (≈$23M) | 5 | 13 | |
| 25 | 56M USD | 4 | 6 | |
| 26 | 39M USD | 3 | 12 | |
| 27 | 105M CAD (≈$77M) | 3 | 37 | |
| 28 | 38M USD | 2 | 8 | |
| 29 | 74M USD | 2 | 11 | |
| 30 | 47M EUR (≈$52M) | 1 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score