Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MicroVision, Inc.
How MicroVision, Inc. stacks up
MVIS · against 31 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
35/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #14 of 32 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including MVIS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 100% of peers. Revenue growth: -74.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 88% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 22.1% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MVIS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MVIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | -74.3% | -0.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 10 reported | Not reported | 45.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | 22.1% | 0.3% | 97% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MVIS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66M USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 2 | 466M SEK (≈$47M) | 96 | 76 | |
| 3 | 45M EUR (≈$50M) | 94 | 82 | |
| 4 | 60M EUR (≈$66M) | 92 | 62 | |
| 5 | 194M HKD (≈$25M) | 88 | 31 | |
| 10 | 6.1B INR (≈$73M) | 64 | 56 | |
| 11 | 192M HKD (≈$25M) | 46 | 45 | |
| 12 | 39.0B KRW (≈$28M) | 41 | 14 | |
| 13 | 835M TWD (≈$26M) | 40 | 14 | |
| 14 | 39M USD | 35 | 12 | |
| 15 | 57M EUR (≈$63M) | 30 | 53 | |
| 16 | 3.0B JPY (≈$21M) | 25 | 12 | |
| 17 | 181M HKD (≈$23M) | 22 | 13 | |
| 18 | 71.3B KRW (≈$51M) | 21 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score