Ranked #129 of 164 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
8 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including MVBF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 71% of peers. Book yield: 105.0% vs peer median 79.5%
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MVBF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MVBF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 163 reported
11.7%
9.0%
70%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 39 reported
Not reported
11.0%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 96 reported
-11.5%
7.7%
14%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 164 reported
105.2%
93.8%
56%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
