Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MasTec, Inc.
How MasTec, Inc. stacks up
MTZ · against 232 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #140 of 233 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MTZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.1% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 222 reported | 3.1% | 3.9% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 233 reported | 7.0% | 6.9% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 1.5% | 3.7% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 219 reported | 22.5% | 26.2% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 3 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 135 | 17.1B USD | 44 | 42 | |
| 140 | 247.0B HKD (≈$31.6B) | 43 | 43 | |
| 140 | 11.2B EUR (≈$12.3B) | 43 | 44 | |
| 140 | 14.4B USD | 43 | 40 | |
| 140 | 15.9B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 140 | 25.6B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 145 | 4.15T JPY (≈$28.2B) | 42 | 50 | |
| 145 | 224.6B SEK (≈$22.5B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 145 | 15.6B USD | 42 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score