Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Minerals Technologies Inc.
How Minerals Technologies Inc. stacks up
MTX · against 401 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #156 of 402 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.4% vs peer median 3.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.1% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.5% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 398 reported | -3.5% | 4.5% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 408 reported | 14.5% | 9.5% | 76% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 103 reported | 6.1% | 4.0% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 386 reported | 78.2% | 57.9% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 8.4B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 4 | 19.9B ZAR (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 156 | 370.5B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 63 | 46 | |
| 156 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 63 | 51 | |
| 156 | 142.6B INR (≈$1.7B) | 63 | 63 | |
| 156 | 3.14T CLP (≈$3.5B) | 63 | 62 | |
| 156 | 2.0B USD | 63 | 33 | |
| 156 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 63 | 38 | |
| 162 | 37.2B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 62 | 57 | |
| 162 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 62 | 67 | |
| 162 | 23.1B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 62 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score