Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
How MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. stacks up
MTSI · against 172 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #150 of 173 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including MTSI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.3% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTSI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTSI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 172 reported | 1.3% | 3.1% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 170 reported | 1.6% | 5.1% | 14% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 0.7% | 3.3% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 165 reported | 8.6% | 17.9% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTSI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 4 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 4 | 10.6B USD | 93 | 68 | |
| 146 | 18.4B USD | 30 | 56 | |
| 148 | 13.2B USD | 29 | 53 | |
| 148 | 20.7B CAD (≈$15.1B) | 29 | 49 | |
| 150 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 28 | 77 | |
| 150 | 18.0B USD | 28 | 58 | |
| 152 | 33.2B USD | 27 | 53 | |
| 153 | 691.4B TWD (≈$21.4B) | 26 | 59 | |
| 153 | 11.9B USD | 26 | 50 | |
| 155 | 612.5B TWD (≈$19.0B) | 24 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score