Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Matrix Service Company
How Matrix Service Company stacks up
MTRX · against 577 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #263 of 578 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score33 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MTRX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.8% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTRX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTRX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 570 reported | -0.9% | 2.2% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 12.8% | 6.2% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 0.5% | 3.2% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 576 reported | 51.9% | 60.1% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTRX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 260 | 3.7B CNY (≈$522M) | 53 | 69 | |
| 260 | 10.5B TRY (≈$314M) | 53 | 46 | |
| 263 | 3.6B CNY (≈$501M) | 52 | 63 | |
| 263 | 382M USD | 52 | 79 | |
| 263 | 270M USD | 52 | 41 | |
| 266 | 2.0B SEK (≈$204M) | 51 | 51 | |
| 267 | 491.4B KRW (≈$354M) | 49 | 23 | |
| 267 | 460.9B KRW (≈$332M) | 49 | 31 | |
| 267 | 268M USD | 49 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score